Hamlet is not mad and does not have an Oedipus Complex

When the writer insists that Hamlet is not mad, and is only pretending to be mad, they need to provide a motivation for his madness. Hatred of his uncle is a commonly cited motivation, but there are other creative explanations as well.

professional essay on Hamlet is Not Mad - ECheat

Hamlet is not mad. Everything he does has a purpose to it. He is out to

No Hamlet is not mad, nor ever was

A. Gertrude does things out of love. She married Claudius because she fell in love with him. However, at first, she didn’t know how much her marriage would hurt Hamlet. She didn’t have any intent on hurting Hamlet. She tries to comfort her son about King Hamlet’s death, saying that all deaths are common; everything that lives will eventually die. She also tries to protect Hamlet after he killed Polonius by telling Claudius that Hamlet is mad, even after she finds out that Hamlet is not mad. She loves Hamlet, and is trying to protect him.

His reaction convinces Claudius that Hamlet is not mad for love

This quote is about Hamlet's father not going to heaven because he could not confess his sins before he died. Hamlet could not kill Claudius while he was praying because he would go to heaven. He doesn't kill him, but rather he decides that he'll wait and kill him later so he can suffer like his father did. This proves that Hamlet is not mad because if he were mad he would not have thought about the consequences of killing Claudius; he just would have done it right then and there.

of certain characters. Claudius and Polonius believe that Hamlet is not mad but
-- mikken (), February 04, 2000.
No Hamlet is not mad, nor ever was. Think about his speech regarding Yorick. Alas poor, Yorick, I knew him Horatio. When Hamlet was young there was a fool in court. Remember what Touchstone says in As You Like It: The more pity that fools cannot speak wisely what wise men do foolishly. Hamlet simply takes on the role of Fool. Unfortunately no-one at the court remembers Yorick and so they cannot understand what Hamlet is doing and so pronounce him mad. That is why Hamlet calls upon the players. His actions as fool have not brought results and so the play's the thing wherein he'll catch the conscience of a King. The play charts Hamlet's attempts to prove his Uncle's guilt. To kill a King was serious even if you were certain he was a murderer. Macbeth comes up against the same problem. When Hamlet returns from England and embarks on the dual his speech regarding the fate of a sparrow answers the question. If it be now etc. He has come to the end of his options, everything will be answer there and then.
-- bonnie (), August 10, 2003.
HAMLEt is clearly NOT mad. he puts on an "anti-disposition". He ses it himself for crying ou loud - its his craft madness!!
This is our video discussing why we believe Hamlet is not mad but merely pretending to be.Made with Explain Everything

Category: Madness and Insanity in Hamlet; Title: Hamlet Was Not Mad

B. Before having her discussion with Hamlet, she is more submissive towards Claudius. However, after talking to Hamlet, she gains more control of her life, and doesn’t do everything Claudius tells her to do. For instance, she doesn’t tell Claudius the truth about Hamlet; how Hamlet is not really mad. And, when Claudius tells her not to drink the cup of wine, she ignores him, and drinks anyways.

Check out our top Free Essays on Hamlet Is Not Mad to help you write your own Essay

Is Hamlet Insane or not Insane? | Yahoo Answers

Hamlet’s madness is an enigma to critics as wells as to the readers. We cannot decide precisely as to whether Hamlet’s madness is real or feigned. There are many situations in the play, which suggest that Hamlet madness is feigned. Bradley says in this regard, "Hamlet is not mad, he is fully responsible for his actions. But he suffers from melancholia a pathological state which may develop into lunacy. His melancholy accounts for his nervous excitability, his longing for death, his irresolution and delay.” Let’s play the devil's advocate:

Bradley says in this regard, "Hamlet is not mad, he is fully responsible for his actions

Hamlet says very clearly that he is not mad, ..

In the play Hamlet, the prince of Denmark finds himself surrounded by corruption and evil. His father (who claims to be recently assassinated) appears as a ghost and tells Hamlet to avenge his death. By the end of the play Hamlet is a murderer, and he and all the old leaders are dead: Denmark has a new, clean start. The big question is, did Hamlet really see a ghost? There is evidence that he is going mad, and it seems very convenient that his father tells him exactly what he believed already, and gave him an excuse to act on it. Some critics suggest that the ghost is a figment of Hamlet's imagination: it's how his unconscious mind lets him murder with a clean conscience. Other critics say, no: others saw the ghost as well, Hamlet knows he is only pretending to be mad, and the bad guys were definitely bad. But none of that proves Hamlet is not mad: the play is set in medieval times, when it would be perfectly common for people (such as Hamlet's friends) to interpret minor events as ghosts. It was also an era where it was common for leaders to be brutal so the fact that hamlet's enemies are killers doesn't prove much. Finally, its quite normal for a mad person to know he is mad, it is also normal to deny it. Basically the jury is still out. But if we accept the modern view that ghosts do not exist then it's case closed: Hamlet imagined the ghost, it's how his unconscious mind let him justify murder.